Revisiting Nutrition Info on Menus and Menu Boards

Posted on March 11, 2009

Last July I wrote about nutrition info being put onto menus in New York and also the reactions to the nutrition info.

I bring this up today because this morning in the local paper I read about a new bill that would require chain restaurants in Utah to post nutrition info.

Here’s the article.

I still like this idea.  Yes, I know a lot of places have nutrition info posted online, or in other places, but it would make it so much easier to see it right there on the menu board.  The people that don’t care will still eat what they want, and the people that do care will be able to make better choices.

Some comments/reactions to laws like this crack me up.  Mostly it’s something like “I would feel guilty knowing that what I want to order has 2,000 Calories in it.  I’d rather not know.”

Another common reaction is “I don’t like ‘Big Brother’ telling me what to eat.  The government shouldn’t control this.” 

Umm, with the nutrition info being posted, no one is telling you what you can or can’t eat.  Everyone is still free to eat what they want, but hopefully some people will make a better choice.

With the prevalence of chronic diseases that are mostly preventable (through better health, including nutrition), shouldn’t we all want to know what’s going in when we eat out?

Do you like laws like this or dislike them?  Holler at me in the comments.  I want to know your thoughts on this. 

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Live
  • FriendFeed
  • email
  • Print

Don't forget to shop for gear at LittleTriathlete

 Subscribe

» Filed Under Nutrition

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/blakehagen/status/1313560021 Blake Hagen

    New post: Revisiting Nutrition Info on Menus http://is.gd/mYT3

  • Reebok

    I am undecided on this issue. For the average overeater, a menu-calorie breakdown would obviously be helpful; However, I find this problematic for undereaters. Even though undereaters are in the minority, a restrictive-inducing caloric guilt trip like this would switch their restrictive mode to “on” and they would once again get underfed.

    I also worry about the message a calorie menu sends. Instead of focusing on the way that healthy food makes us feel, we instead become hyper-conscious about calories and fat percentages. This in turn may lead to an unhealthy preoccupation with weight and body image.

    The point of eating healthy is to increase health; guilt-trips, hyperconsciousness, and preoccupation with food does not fall into the “health” category.

  • Blake Hagen

    @Reebok

    Good take. Most people (myself included) forget about the “undereaters” out there. People that are hyper-conscious about food or struggle with eating disorders, etc. may find something like this hurts them rather than helps them.

    Ideally, people would make better choices and focus on how healthy food makes them feel. Sadly, for most people, this hasn’t happened, and I believe this is at least an attempt to help people make better choices.

    There are many sides to this issue, and thanks for reminding me about this one. I tend to think of this only from an overeater stand point.

    It will be interesting to see if this bill passes… Thanks for the comment.

  • Margaret Majors

    “Do you like laws like this or dislike them?”

    I would hesitate to generalize about “laws like this,” as I think every law needs to be considered very carefully, but this particular law may be good and necessary as we try to rescue our collective national health from the brink of disaster.

    It’s not just overeaters/overweight who need/want information about what is in the food they eat, but even people of normal eating habits and weight need to be aware of what fuel they are putting in their bodies.

    Even naturally thin folks, who seem to “get away” with eating junk food/too many calories, are doing bad things to their interiors by eating this way.

    They may not be motivated to educate themselves about healthy eating, and this could help them (and the children they raise), as well.

  • Blake Hagen

    @Margaret Majors

    Well said, thank you. Again, I think something like this would be beneficial for most people (whether they believe it or not). It would open some people’s eyes about what they are eating.

  • http://alifelesssweet.blogspot.com/ cathy

    I have conflicting feelings on this, but knowledge is power, right? I think that my menu choices could be very different with the nutritional information staring me in the face.

    Interesting post and interesting comments!

    cathy´s last blog post..New and improved Propel? I think not…

  • Blake Hagen

    @cathy

    I think that’s what law-makers are getting at — the nutrition info staring people in the face to help them realize they can make better choices.

    I think a lot of people have conflicting feelings on this. Thanks for sharing.

  • http://fatfightertv.com/blog/ FatFighterTV

    I’ve heard the same things you mentioned whenever I’ve posted something about requiring calories on menus. You make a good point about Big Brother – we are still free to choose. Personally, I want to see the calories and choose based on what I know.

    FatFighterTV´s last blog post..Good workout songs – YOUR favorites

  • Blake Hagen

    @FatFighterTV

    Yup, no one is forcing us to eat specific things. We choose. Thanks for sharing your view.

blog comments powered by Disqus